Modifying utility symbols on Android units absent a customized residence display utility presents a definite problem. Whereas launchers routinely present easy icon customization, circumventing their use requires various strategies. These strategies usually leverage specialised functions or system settings, relying on the Android model and producer customizations.
The power to change utility symbols provides customers enhanced personalization and visible distinction of their cellular surroundings. Traditionally, this stage of customization was largely unique to rooted units or customers prepared to put in aftermarket launchers. Present options try to bridge this hole, permitting customers to tailor their units to particular aesthetic preferences or practical wants with out essentially altering the core system.
This dialogue will discover out there methods for reaching icon modifications with out using a full-fledged launcher alternative. It can delve into the constraints, potential dangers, and step-by-step procedures related to every method, offering a complete overview for people in search of to customise their Android expertise.
1. App Icon Changers
App Icon Changers signify a category of functions particularly designed to handle icon modification on Android methods with out the set up of an entire customized launcher. They try to offer a level of aesthetic personalization whereas sustaining the inventory consumer interface. Nevertheless, the performance and effectiveness of those functions can fluctuate considerably relying on the Android model, the producer’s customizations, and the particular implementation of the app itself.
-
Performance and Mechanism
App Icon Changers usually function by making a shortcut on the house display that mimics the unique utility icon. The shortcut then directs to the precise utility. This oblique technique bypasses the system’s default icon show, permitting the app to current a user-selected picture or customized design because the icon. Nevertheless, the unique utility icon stays unchanged within the app drawer and system settings.
-
Limitations and Compatibility
The constraints of App Icon Changers stem from their reliance on creating shortcuts. Android variations and producer skins can impose restrictions on shortcut habits, resulting in inconsistencies or malfunctions. As an illustration, some implementations might not help notification badges on the customized icons, or shortcuts might exhibit delays when launching functions. Compatibility points are prevalent, with older Android variations typically providing higher help in comparison with newer, extra restrictive iterations.
-
Consumer Expertise Issues
The consumer expertise with App Icon Changers can fluctuate. Whereas offering a seemingly easy resolution, the creation of quite a few shortcuts can muddle the house display and probably impression efficiency. Furthermore, managing and reverting icon modifications could be cumbersome, significantly if the consumer has personalized a lot of functions. The presence of watermarks or commercials throughout the functions can even detract from the general consumer expertise.
-
Safety and Privateness Implications
As with every third-party utility, safety and privateness implications have to be thought of. App Icon Changers require permissions to entry and modify utility shortcuts, probably exposing consumer knowledge or introducing vulnerabilities. It’s essential to pick respected functions from trusted sources and thoroughly assessment the permissions requested earlier than granting entry. Some malicious functions might masquerade as icon changers to achieve entry to delicate info.
In conclusion, App Icon Changers supply a possible avenue for customizing utility symbols with no launcher, however their effectiveness is usually compromised by compatibility points, practical limitations, and potential safety dangers. Customers ought to rigorously consider these concerns earlier than implementing such functions to make sure a passable and safe customization expertise. The diploma of customization doable, due to this fact, is a trade-off towards performance and safety.
2. Accessibility Providers
Accessibility Providers on Android, primarily designed to help customers with disabilities, can typically be not directly employed to attain icon customization with no launcher. This isn’t the meant goal of those companies, and their utility for icon modification is usually a workaround with restricted performance and potential drawbacks. The next factors discover this oblique relationship.
-
Occasion Monitoring and Triggering
Accessibility Providers possess the potential to watch system occasions, together with utility launches. In principle, an utility leveraging Accessibility Providers may detect the launch of a particular utility after which overlay a customized icon or picture on high of the prevailing one. This method does not change the underlying utility icon however slightly gives a visible masking impact. The technical issue and useful resource depth of precisely and reliably implementing such a system contribute to its rare use.
-
Restricted Scope and System Restrictions
The scope of icon modification by way of Accessibility Providers is inherently restricted by the system’s restrictions on overlaying content material and the consumer’s granted permissions. Producers usually implement safety measures to forestall abuse of Accessibility Providers, proscribing their capability to change crucial system parts, together with the house display icons. Moreover, overuse of Accessibility Providers can impression system efficiency and battery life, making it an impractical resolution for widespread icon customization.
-
Moral and Safety Issues
Using Accessibility Providers for functions apart from their meant use raises moral concerns. Accessibility Providers are designed to help customers with disabilities, and their misuse can undermine their main operate and probably create safety vulnerabilities. Granting broad entry to Accessibility Providers can expose delicate consumer knowledge and compromise system safety. Due to this fact, functions using Accessibility Providers for icon modification must be approached with warning and completely vetted for malicious intent.
-
Upkeep and Reliability Challenges
The reliability of icon modification utilizing Accessibility Providers is contingent on the consistency of the Android system and the particular implementation of the service. System updates and producer modifications can disrupt the performance of the service, requiring frequent updates and upkeep. The dearth of official help and the reliance on undocumented system behaviors make this method inherently unstable and unreliable for long-term icon customization.
In conclusion, whereas Accessibility Providers can theoretically be leveraged for icon modification with no launcher, this method is fraught with limitations, moral concerns, and technical challenges. It isn’t a really helpful resolution for widespread icon customization resulting from its instability, potential safety dangers, and impression on system efficiency. Alternate options resembling app icon changers, whereas additionally restricted, supply a extra direct and infrequently safer method, even with their very own caveats.
3. Restricted Customization
The phrase ” change icons on android with out launcher” intrinsically implies limitations within the scope of personalization achievable. The absence of a devoted launcher utility, designed explicitly for in depth consumer interface modification, inherently restricts the choices out there for icon alteration. This limitation manifests in a number of methods, influencing the extent to which customers can tailor the visible look of their machine.
For instance, strategies that circumvent launcher use, resembling using icon changer functions, usually function by creating shortcuts slightly than straight modifying the system’s icon assets. These shortcuts might lack options like notification badges or dynamic icon updates, that are usually supported by launchers. The consumer is constrained to static icon replacements, forfeiting extra superior customization prospects. Moreover, the consistency of icon modifications throughout your entire system is usually compromised, with personalized icons solely showing on the house display and reverting to default icons within the app drawer or settings menus. The diploma of change, due to this fact, is constrained to a superficial stage, affecting visible presentation with out altering core system habits.
Understanding the inherent limitations of ” change icons on android with out launcher” is essential for managing consumer expectations. Whereas some extent of icon personalization is feasible by way of various strategies, the extent of customization is considerably decreased in comparison with using a full-fledged launcher. Customers should weigh the trade-offs between the simplicity of avoiding a launcher and the extra complete customization choices it gives. The pursuit of icon modifications with no launcher is thus a negotiation between ease of use and the depth of visible personalization that may be achieved.
4. Android Model
The Android working system’s model exerts a substantial affect on the feasibility and technique of altering utility icons with out using a customized launcher. System-level restrictions and the diploma of permissible customization are straight correlated with the Android model put in on the machine. Older Android iterations, previous to Android 5.0 (Lollipop), typically supplied larger flexibility resulting from fewer safety constraints. Functions designed to alter icons may extra simply entry and modify shortcut properties, permitting for a comparatively seamless icon alternative expertise. Conversely, newer Android variations (Android 8.0 Oreo and later) have applied stricter safety measures that restrict the scope of icon customization achievable with no launcher. These limitations are designed to guard system integrity and forestall malicious functions from altering the consumer interface with out specific consent.
A concrete instance of this affect could be noticed within the performance of icon-changing functions. On older Android variations, such functions would possibly straight change the icon related to an utility shortcut on the house display. Nevertheless, on newer variations, these functions are sometimes restricted to creating overlay icons or shortcuts that time to the unique utility. This ends in a much less built-in and probably much less aesthetically pleasing resolution, as the unique icon stays seen within the app drawer and settings. Moreover, the introduction of adaptive icons in Android 8.0 and later requires functions to stick to particular icon styles and sizes, additional complicating the method of icon customization and necessitating compatibility changes by icon-changing functions. The sensible significance of this understanding lies within the want for customers to mood their expectations concerning the extent of customization doable based mostly on their machine’s Android model. Strategies that work flawlessly on older units could also be fully ineffective or produce suboptimal outcomes on newer ones.
In abstract, the Android model is a crucial determinant of the strategies out there and the diploma of success attainable when trying to alter utility icons with no launcher. Newer variations impose stricter safety measures that prohibit icon customization, whereas older variations supply larger flexibility. Customers should take into account their machine’s Android model to pick applicable strategies and handle expectations accordingly. The continuing evolution of the Android working system continues to form the panorama of icon customization, presenting each alternatives and challenges for customers in search of to personalize their units with out using a customized launcher.
5. Producer Skins
Producer skins, often known as customized Android distributions, considerably impression the flexibility to change utility icons absent a third-party launcher. These skins, developed by machine producers, introduce modifications to the core Android working system, affecting the consumer interface, pre-installed functions, and system-level performance. Consequently, the success and strategies related to altering icons are closely depending on the particular pores and skin applied by the producer.
-
Icon Pack Help
Some producer skins, resembling these discovered on units from ASUS or OnePlus, natively incorporate help for icon packs. This characteristic permits customers to use icon packs downloaded from the Google Play Retailer, altering the looks of utility icons throughout the system with out requiring a separate launcher. Conversely, skins from producers like Samsung (One UI) or Huawei (EMUI) might lack native icon pack help, necessitating various strategies or rendering icon pack functions ineffective. The presence or absence of this characteristic profoundly shapes the convenience with which icons could be personalized.
-
Theme Engine Integration
Sure skins embrace theme engines that present a complete suite of customization choices, together with icon modification. These theme engines enable customers to obtain and apply themes that alter varied features of the consumer interface, together with utility icons. Nevertheless, the provision and performance of theme engines fluctuate considerably throughout producers. Some skins might supply in depth theme choices, whereas others present restricted or no theme help. The depth and breadth of theme engine integration straight affect the extent to which customers can personalize their icons with out resorting to a launcher alternative.
-
App Icon Masking and Theming
Producer skins usually make use of app icon masking, which goals to unify the looks of utility icons by making use of a uniform form or background to icons that don’t conform to the pores and skin’s visible type. Whereas this characteristic promotes visible consistency, it will probably additionally hinder icon customization efforts. When customers try to use customized icons, the pores and skin’s masking mechanism might override the meant look, leading to distorted or visually inconsistent icons. The presence and configurability of app icon masking considerably impression the effectiveness of third-party icon modification instruments.
-
Safety Restrictions
Producer skins introduce various ranges of safety restrictions that have an effect on the flexibility of functions to change system settings, together with utility icons. Some skins might impose stringent limitations on functions’ entry to system assets, stopping icon-changing functions from functioning appropriately. These restrictions are sometimes applied to guard system stability and forestall malicious functions from altering the consumer interface with out consumer consent. The diploma of safety restriction varies throughout producers and Android variations, impacting the feasibility of circumventing launcher use for icon customization.
In conclusion, producer skins play an important position in figuring out the strategies and limitations related to icon customization with no launcher. Native icon pack help, theme engine integration, app icon masking, and safety restrictions all contribute to the complicated panorama of icon modification on Android units. Customers in search of to alter icons with no launcher should rigorously take into account the particular pores and skin applied on their machine to determine viable options and handle expectations accordingly. The interaction between producer customizations and consumer customization efforts stays a big consider reaching desired visible outcomes.
6. Root Entry
Root entry, the unrestricted privilege to change system information on an Android machine, essentially alters the panorama of icon customization capabilities with out the necessity for a third-party launcher. The inherent limitations imposed by producer skins and Android model safety restrictions are largely circumvented by way of root privileges. With root entry, direct modification of system information chargeable for icon presentation turns into doable, enabling complete and chronic modifications unattainable by way of typical strategies. For instance, customers can straight change the default icons saved throughout the system’s useful resource folders, affecting the looks of functions throughout your entire machine, together with the house display, app drawer, and settings menus. The significance of root entry lies in its capability to bypass the substitute constraints imposed by the working system, granting customers absolute management over the visible aesthetics of their machine. This method, nonetheless, carries inherent dangers. Improper modification of system information can result in system instability, boot loops, or full machine failure. Due to this fact, root entry necessitates an intensive understanding of the Android system structure and meticulous execution of modification procedures. Furthermore, rooting a tool might void the producer’s guarantee, relinquishing official help and recourse for potential {hardware} or software program points.
Particular examples of root-enabled icon customization embrace modifying the `framework-res.apk` file, which comprises the default icons for varied system functions and parts. By changing the icons inside this file with customized options, customers can alter the looks of system icons which can be in any other case unchangeable by way of typical means. One other utility of root entry includes using specialised functions designed to handle and modify icon themes on the system stage. These functions present a user-friendly interface for choosing and making use of icon packs, streamlining the method of system-wide icon customization. Moreover, root entry permits the set up of customized ROMs (Learn-Solely Reminiscence), which regularly embrace built-in icon customization choices or enable for the set up of customized themes with built-in icon packs. The sensible implications of those capabilities are important for customers in search of a very personalised Android expertise, permitting them to transcend the constraints imposed by producer skins and system-level restrictions. This extends to making use of customized icon packs to system apps and altering notification iconsoptions unavailable with out root entry.
In conclusion, root entry considerably enhances the potential for icon customization on Android units with out requiring a launcher, enabling direct modification of system information and bypassing producer restrictions. Whereas providing unparalleled management and customization prospects, it introduces substantial dangers, together with system instability and guarantee voidance. The advantages of root entry have to be rigorously weighed towards the potential penalties, requiring an intensive understanding of the Android system and meticulous execution of modification procedures. The pursuit of ” change icons on android with out launcher” by way of root entry is due to this fact a high-risk, high-reward endeavor, demanding warning and experience. The choice rests on the consumer’s consolation stage with technical complexities and their acceptance of the inherent dangers concerned.
7. Icon Packs
Icon packs are a set of utility icons designed to exchange the default icons on an Android machine, forming an important part of makes an attempt to change icons absent a customized launcher. The efficacy of icon packs on this context hinges on their compatibility with out there strategies for icon alternative, resembling app icon changers or manufacturer-provided theme engines. As an illustration, a consumer would possibly obtain an icon pack from the Google Play Retailer that includes a minimalist design after which try to use it utilizing an icon changer utility. The diploma of success, nonetheless, is contingent upon the Android model and any manufacturer-imposed restrictions. In situations the place a tool lacks native help for making use of icon packs straight, the utility of the icon pack is inherently restricted, usually requiring handbook shortcut creation or rendering it fully unusable. Due to this fact, the significance of icon packs is straight tied to the provision of mechanisms for his or her implementation, making them a probably useful, however not universally relevant, instrument in icon modification.
Moreover, the design and comprehensiveness of an icon pack considerably affect its sensible worth. A well-designed icon pack encompasses a variety of fashionable functions, making certain visible consistency throughout the house display and app drawer. Conversely, an incomplete icon pack might solely embrace icons for a restricted set of functions, resulting in a fragmented and aesthetically displeasing consumer expertise. Builders create icon packs masking fashionable apps and themed designs for system apps the place relevant. Icon packs additionally are available varied design themes resembling darkish themes, colourful themes, or particular types resembling glass morphism. The extent of element, design consistency, and breadth of utility protection contribute on to the general effectiveness of an icon pack as a instrument for icon customization. The distribution mannequin, whether or not free or paid, additionally impacts the standard and updates supplied for these packs.
In conclusion, icon packs signify a significant useful resource for people pursuing icon customization with no launcher, however their utility is contingent on machine compatibility and design high quality. The supply of practical strategies for making use of icon packs, whether or not by way of native help or third-party functions, dictates their sensible significance. Finally, the profitable integration of icon packs into the Android surroundings relies on a confluence of things, together with Android model, producer customizations, and the inherent traits of the icon pack itself. The challenges are machine compatibility and incomplete icon protection throughout all put in functions.
8. Shortcut Creation
Shortcut creation is intrinsically linked to reaching icon modification on Android units when bypassing the usage of a customized launcher. This connection arises from the restricted strategies out there for straight altering utility icons on the system stage with out root entry or launcher-specific theming capabilities. Within the absence of direct icon alternative, making a shortcut turns into a main technique of presenting a customized icon on the house display. The working system is leveraged to generate a brand new entry level to the applying, this entry level possessing distinct visible properties from the unique utility icon situated within the app drawer. The significance of shortcut creation stems from its accessibility and relative ease of implementation in comparison with extra invasive system modifications. The commonest instance could be noticed with devoted “icon changer” functions, which operate by producing a shortcut with a user-selected picture that then directs to the unique utility. This method provides a superficial, albeit practical, type of icon customization.
Moreover, the practicality of this technique extends to eventualities the place customers need to tell apart between a number of situations of the identical utility. Think about a consumer with two completely different accounts for a social media platform. By creating separate shortcuts for every account and assigning distinct icons, the consumer can simply differentiate between them straight on the house display. This utility highlights the flexibility of shortcut creation past mere aesthetic customization. Nevertheless, this method additionally introduces limitations. The unique utility icon stays unchanged throughout the app drawer, resulting in a visible inconsistency. Moreover, some shortcut implementations might lack notification badges, probably diminishing the consumer expertise. The efficacy of shortcut creation as an icon modification technique is, due to this fact, a trade-off between ease of use and practical limitations.
In conclusion, shortcut creation serves as a cornerstone method for altering utility icons on Android units with out using a customized launcher. Whereas it provides a simple resolution for superficial icon customization, its inherent limitations concerning system-wide consistency and potential practical drawbacks necessitate a balanced perspective. The strategies effectiveness is basically depending on the consumer’s particular wants and acceptance of the compromises concerned. Its significance lies in its accessibility, offering a viable pathway for icon personalization even within the absence of extra complete system-level modification capabilities.
9. Widget Utilization
Widget utilization presents an oblique, but probably viable, technique for reaching a level of icon customization on Android units with out the necessity for a customized launcher. Whereas widgets themselves don’t straight alter utility icons, their capability to launch functions provides a method of circumventing the default icon show. The creation of customized widgets that function utility launchers permits customers to current an alternate visible illustration instead of the usual icon. The significance of widget utilization lies in its accessibility and its capability to combine a level of personalised aesthetics onto the house display, even when it does not essentially change the underlying utility icons. For instance, a consumer may make use of a widget creation utility to design a customized widget that includes a novel picture or graphic. This widget would then be configured to launch a particular utility, successfully changing the applying’s default icon on the house display with the widget’s visible illustration.
Additional evaluation reveals that the extent of customization achievable by way of widget utilization varies based mostly on the capabilities of the widget creation utility and the consumer’s design abilities. Some functions supply in depth design choices, together with the flexibility to include customized photos, textual content, and graphical parts into the widget’s look. This permits for a excessive diploma of personalization and inventive expression. Different functions might present extra restricted customization choices, proscribing the consumer’s capability to tailor the widget to their particular preferences. In sensible functions, widget utilization is especially helpful for customers who need to create a visually cohesive residence display structure. By designing customized widgets that complement the general aesthetic theme, customers can obtain a larger sense of visible concord and personalization than could be doable with default utility icons. Nevertheless, the constraints of this technique should even be acknowledged. Widgets usually devour extra system assets than easy utility shortcuts, probably impacting machine efficiency and battery life. The impact on efficiency differs by machine and the complexity of the designed widget.
In conclusion, widget utilization gives a pathway to attain restricted icon customization with no customized launcher, primarily by creating visible substitutes for utility icons on the house display. The effectiveness of this technique is contingent on the sophistication of the widget creation instruments and the consumer’s design capabilities. Whereas widgets supply a useful technique of personalizing the house display, potential efficiency drawbacks and the absence of direct icon alteration are vital concerns. The connection between widget utilization and icon customization is, due to this fact, a relationship of oblique substitution, providing a practical workaround slightly than a elementary resolution. The inherent problem is the compromise between visible customizability and system useful resource utilization. The strategy provides a usable resolution for a section of customers.
Often Requested Questions
The next questions handle frequent inquiries and misconceptions concerning the method of altering utility icons on Android units with out using a customized launcher utility.
Query 1: What are the constraints of modifying icons with no launcher?
Attaining icon modification with no launcher usually ends in restricted system-wide consistency. Icon modifications might solely be seen on the house display, whereas the app drawer and settings menu retain the unique icons. Moreover, strategies usually depend on creating shortcuts, which can lack notification badges or dynamic icon updates. Direct icon alternative is mostly not doable with out root entry or launcher help.
Query 2: Is root entry required to totally customise Android icons?
Root entry gives probably the most complete management over icon customization, enabling direct modification of system information chargeable for icon presentation. Nevertheless, root entry additionally introduces dangers, together with system instability and voiding the machine guarantee. Whereas providing unparalleled customization prospects, it’s not a necessity for primary icon modifications utilizing various strategies.
Query 3: Do app icon changers pose safety dangers?
App icon changers usually require permissions to entry and modify utility shortcuts, probably exposing consumer knowledge or introducing vulnerabilities. It’s essential to pick respected functions from trusted sources and thoroughly assessment the permissions requested earlier than granting entry. Malicious functions might masquerade as icon changers to achieve entry to delicate info.
Query 4: How does the Android model have an effect on icon modification capabilities?
The Android model considerably influences the feasibility of altering icons with no launcher. Newer variations impose stricter safety measures that prohibit icon customization, whereas older variations supply larger flexibility. Strategies that work flawlessly on older units could also be fully ineffective or produce suboptimal outcomes on newer ones.
Query 5: Do producer skins impression icon customization?
Producer skins, often known as customized Android distributions, introduce modifications to the core Android working system, affecting the consumer interface and system performance. Some skins supply native icon pack help or theme engine integration, whereas others lack these options, impacting the convenience with which icons could be personalized.
Query 6: Can widgets be used to exchange utility icons?
Widgets themselves don’t straight alter utility icons, their capability to launch functions provides a method of circumventing the default icon show. The creation of customized widgets that function utility launchers permits customers to current an alternate visible illustration instead of the usual icon. Though widgets can change normal icons, they might devour extra system assets than shortcuts.
These FAQs present a foundational understanding of the challenges and alternatives related to icon modification on Android units with out the help of a devoted launcher utility. Consciousness of those components is important for managing expectations and choosing applicable customization strategies.
The next part will discover potential future developments on this space.
Suggestions for Icon Modification And not using a Launcher
The next suggestions present steerage on maximizing icon customization potential whereas mitigating frequent points encountered when altering Android utility icons with no devoted launcher.
Tip 1: Prioritize Respected Sources: When choosing icon changer functions, favor well-established builders and platforms to attenuate safety dangers. Confirm the applying’s permissions earlier than set up to forestall unauthorized entry to delicate knowledge.
Tip 2: Assess Android Model Compatibility: Acknowledge that older strategies might not operate successfully on newer Android variations resulting from evolving safety protocols. Analysis the compatibility of icon changer functions with the machine’s working system earlier than implementing modifications.
Tip 3: Discover Native Theme Engine Choices: Earlier than resorting to third-party functions, examine whether or not the machine’s producer pores and skin gives a built-in theme engine or icon pack help. Native options usually supply a extra seamless and steady customization expertise.
Tip 4: Create Backup of House Display screen: Previous to implementing important icon modifications, create a backup of the house display structure. This permits for simple restoration to the unique configuration in case of unexpected points or dissatisfaction with the modifications.
Tip 5: Handle Shortcut Litter: Be aware of the variety of shortcuts created throughout icon modification. Extreme shortcuts can muddle the house display and probably impression machine efficiency. Manage shortcuts into folders or make the most of various residence display preparations to take care of readability.
Tip 6: Confirm Icon Pack Completeness: When using icon packs, make sure that the pack consists of icons for a majority of the put in functions. Incomplete icon packs can result in a visually inconsistent consumer interface.
Tip 7: Think about Widget Alternate options: Consider the potential of using customized widgets as substitutes for utility icons. Whereas not a direct alternative, widgets can supply a level of visible personalization and practical integration on the house display.
Tip 8: Perceive the Safety Implications of Root Entry: Earlier than trying icon customization strategies that require root entry, completely analysis the potential dangers and penalties. Solely proceed with root entry if snug with the technical complexities and ready for potential system instability.
Adhering to those suggestions can improve the chance of reaching profitable icon modification whereas minimizing the dangers related to third-party functions and system alterations.
The next part gives a short conclusion to this text.
Conclusion
This exploration of ” change icons on android with out launcher” reveals a panorama marked by inherent limitations and numerous methodologies. The feasibility and extent of icon modification are dictated by components together with Android model, producer customizations, and the provision of root entry. Whereas third-party functions and widget implementations supply avenues for personalization, a direct and complete system-wide alteration stays elusive with out important system-level privileges.
The pursuit of aesthetic customization on Android units necessitates a cautious analysis of accessible instruments and their related trade-offs. Customers should weigh the advantages of visible personalization towards the potential dangers of system instability or safety vulnerabilities. Additional developments in Android’s customization framework might present extra seamless and safe options, probably obviating the necessity for complicated workarounds. The long run might maintain extra user-friendly and secure manner in customising icon in android units with no launcher.
